----
A skeptic's Apple Watch diary: Day 7, decision time //
9to5Mac 
I outlined in my first diary piece why I decided to out an Apple Watch to the test, despite being skeptical about the value of smartwatches. The short version is that there's only one way to judge a new product category, and that's by living with it for a while.
I set an arbitrary test period of one week because I think that's long enough to determine if and how I use it, and what difference it makes to my everyday life. I do recognize that a week isn't long enough for the ultimate test: will it have been consigned to a drawer two or three months down the line? But I figured you wouldn't want to wait quite that long for my verdict.
Let's start with what have now been very firmly identified as non-issues …
Look & feel is a non-issue because I'm totally used to both now. I'm no longer conscious of having something on my wrist, and it now looks perfectly normal to me. Nothing to see here, move along.
Battery-life is the same. The watch has comfortably made it through a full day every single day (though bear in mind I'm using the 42mm model, with its presumably larger battery). So let's move swiftly along to the user-interface.
I said last time that the UI is very well thought-through, and quickly became second-nature. That remains my view. That's not to say it's perfect: I have discovered a few glitches along the way. Let me give a few examples.
When you get a notification, Apple says you see a 'short glance' when you first raise your wrist, and then – if you continue to hold your wrist up – it automatically switches to the 'long glance,' with more detail. In reality, the short glance is so brief that I can't even tell you what most of them look like: by the time I've raised my wrist and looked at it, it is already scrolling off into the long glance. The short glance is pointless as it stands. In fact, from the glimpses I've seen, they are pointless period.
Second, the stand reminders, where the watch prompts us to stand up for at least one minute per hour, lack intelligence. The watch can't tell when I'm standing, only when I'm moving, so it's a bit irritating to be reminded to stand when I already am. Also, when it gives my 'standing times' tally for the day, it only seems to count the times I responded to the alert, not all the other times I was standing in between alerts.
Third, the watch sends notifications for messages even when I've already replied to them on my phone, iPad or Mac. The watch notification shows the reply I sent, so it really should be able to work out that the watch alert is superfluous.
This leads into a broader complaint I have about the Apple ecosystem. I get notifications for many things on all of my Apple devices. A calendar alert, for example, appears on my Mac, iPad, iPhone and Watch – and I have to individually dismiss them from all four devices. At the very least, dismissing it on one should dismiss it on all. Better yet would be to figure out from activity which one I'm actively using, send it to that one first and only send it elsewhere – say 30 seconds later – if I fail to respond. Perhaps for watch owners, send it first to the watch – if you are wearing it – then on to other devices.
Fourth, the watch needs a little more intelligence in regard to actively-running apps. By default, when you raise your wrist spontaneously (that is, not in response to a notification), it displays the watch face. That's what I want most of the time, but there are times when I want to see the currently-running app instead. For example, if I set a countdown timer for 10 minutes while cooking, it's a pretty sure-fire bet that's what I want to see when I raise my wrist five minutes later; instead, I get the watch face.
Sure, there are a couple of workarounds for this. I could change the default behaviour to display the last-run app. Or I could add the timer to my watch face as a complication. But I don't want to do either of these things just as a one-off, only to have to switch them back again afterwards. I'd like the watch to be able to figure out for itself very obvious things like a timer set for a short time.
I could go on, but the bottom-line is that these are all very minor complaints, and I could come up with equivalent ones for iOS or OS X. In general, the UI works well and the watch mostly behaves as you'd expect it to.
One issue I raised before, not as a complaint about the watch but as a question mark about its usefulness for at-a-glance alerts, is that some of the time the watch is tucked away beneath a sleeve. With slimfit shirts, the 'flick your wrist to uncover the watch' trick doesn't work, and uncovering the watch when wearing a cycling jacket is not something I can do one-handed, so it's actually easier for me to reach into my pocket for my phone.
As an experiment, I tried wearing it outside my jacket sleeve. I wasn't 100% sure this would work, as Apple talked about skin contact being needed to keep it unlocked, but it seems this is just for Apple Pay. For most usage, the watch works with or without skin contact: unlock it once, and it remains unlocked.
There were just enough holes in the watch strap to wrap around my cycling jacket sleeve. What I noticed, however, is that while I could still use the watch, most notifications stopped. Not all, but most. However, going into the companion app, into General and then sliding Wrist Detection off solved this: I once again got notifications on the watch.
Of course, losing skin contact means you lose heart-rate data, and that also means you lose other data, like calories. But, as I say, I'm not really into fitness stats, so that's not a big deal for me.
One reader, Maxeichbaum, made an excellent suggestion in the comments to my previous diary entry. If I wanted to complete my test of how useful it is, I should leave it off for a day and see whether I missed it.
Given the short nature of my test, just one week, I opted to leave it off for an evening out. The result? Yes, I missed it.
Not in the way I would my iPhone or iPad. I wasn't getting the shakes, or glancing nervously toward the exit wondering how soon I could leave to get back my beloved gadget. But when the phone bleeped from my pocket, I looked at my empty wrist and it felt like just a tiny bit of a hassle to have to reach for my phone instead.
So, the look & feel works, the UI works, I found a workaround for my cycling issue – and I did miss it a bit when I went out without it. So what's my verdict, and am I keeping it?
I completely go along with the consensus view on this: nobody needs an Apple Watch. It doesn't do anything you can't do without your iPhone aside from heart-rate monitoring, and there are much cheaper ways to get that.
Is it useful anyway? Honestly? Mildly. There are times when it's undeniably a bit more convenient to see notifications on my wrist rather than my phone. If I missed a bit of a podcast, backing up on the watch is marginally more convenient than taking the phone out of my pocket. You can say that Passbook is more convenient on your wrist, no longer having to juggle passport, phone and bag at the airport departure gate. It will be nice not to have to get my phone out of my pocket to pay for something once Apple finally brings Apple Pay to the UK. And so on.
But really, there's no killer app – at least, not yet. And nothing which honestly justifies five hundred bucks. I ought to stick it on eBay, pocket the profit and buy something more useful.
I could underline that 'not yet' part of the killer app, and point to the fact that the more apps there are out there, the more useful the watch becomes, and any one of those future apps could turn out to be my own personal killer app.
I could also, as several of you pointed out, argue that keeping it makes sense because it's my job to write about Apple stuff. Maybe there would be interest in one last diary piece, some way down the road, looking at my long-term experience. Maybe I'll want to review Apple Watch apps, or stands.
But all that would be post-hoc rationalization. The truth is, I'm keeping it, as you all correctly predicted, for the reason you all correctly predicted: because I'm a gadget guy, and it's a cool gadget. I don't need it. It's not justified. But, despite my initial skepticism, I like it – so I'm keeping it. Sorry to all those who wanted to buy it …
Filed under:
Apple Watch Tagged:
Apple watch,
Apple Watch diary,
Apple Watch review,
Apple Watch test,
Apple Watch trial,
Apple Watch useful For more news on Apple watch, Apple Watch, and Apple Watch diary continue reading at 9to5Mac.
What do you think? Discuss "A skeptic's Apple Watch diary: Day 7, decision time" with our community.
----
Shared via
my feedly reader 
微軟今天在 Build 上示範了將 Windows 10 Phone 的手機或平板變身為迷你桌電的二合一功能「Continuum」。基本上當手機或平板偵測到滑鼠鍵盤的插入時，就會自動將介面切換到「桌面模式」，提供了開始功能表、工具列等一般只有在桌面環境才會看到的 UI 元件。再將滑鼠鍵盤移除，系統就會跳出一個對話框來，問你要不要恢復到觸控的模式。對於常常出門在外工作，又不想拖著一台大筆電四處跑的人，這個功能看起來很潛力，但手機硬體還要再一輪升級大概才能完整地實作所有的功能。... 
Windows 8 一個常常讓人摸不著頭緒的地方，是裡面的軟體分成傳統的桌面軟體，以及適合觸控操作的「Metro-Style」軟體。兩者像是完全不同的兩個世界，一個是大家熟悉的傳統 Windows PC 使用方式，另一個則是走類似 iOS 和 Android 的模式，有自己的啟動介面 (Live Tiles) 和自己的商店。微軟希望在 Windows 10 上打破這點，未來 Windows Store 不僅會有 Metro-style 的 App，也會開始販售 Win32 和 .NET 的軟體，... 
當微軟幾個月前發表 Windows Holographic 軟體及 HoloLens 頭戴顯示器的時候，就有提過在上面跑 Windows 10 app 的可能性，如今微軟總算是讓我們看到實際操作起來是什麼樣子。各別的 App 可以自由在虛空中漂浮，或是「掛」在牆上，並依需求自由縮放，一如之前看過的假想影片中那樣。當然，這意味著不同地點的人可以合作進行 3D 建模或其他傳統上在 2D 環境很難達成的協作項目。任何 Windows 10 的 app 都可以在虛空中投射，所以擺脫辦公桌的時代可能很快就... 
The Apple Watch is rolling out to customers, but it's taking longer to get into user hands than some might like. A new report out today by The Wall Street Journal puts the blame for the slow rollout primarily on a shortage of Apple Watch Taptic Engine components, caused by issues found in the parts supplied by one supplier in particular. The WSJ author who penned the piece clarified… 
